Summary
After a 5 week conditioning period on a recumbent cycle, The High Intensity Interval Training (HIIT) group perform sprints while the Endurance Training (ET) group performed a more traditional aerobic protocol, throughout the remaining 15 weeks. Both groups progressed in intensity. At the conclusion of the study, the HIIT group lost over 3 times as much subcutaneous fat as the ET group despite expending less than half as many calories. For every calorie expended during HIIT, there was a nine fold loss of subcutaneous body fat, as compared to the ET group.
Comparison
(20 week program, 17 subjects)
Mode (ergocycle) | Endurance Training | High Intensity Interval Training |
Duration (minutes) | 30 and increased to 45 | 30 |
Frequency | 4/wk and increased to 5/wk | 25 continuous sessions; half completed before week 5 Week 5-20: 19 long & 16 short interval sessions |
Intensity | 60% HRR and increased to 85% HRR | 70% HRR warmup 60% of max output in 10 seconds & 70% of max output in 90 seconds; increasing 5% every 3 weeks |
Energy Expended (MJ) | 120.4 ± 31.0 | 57.9 ± 14.4 |
Fat Loss (mm) | 4.5 | 13.9 |
HIIT Protocol
- High Intensity Interval Training (HIIT)
- 5 minute warm-up at 50% HRR
- Short-interval work
- Initially 10 and later 15 bouts
- 15 seconds increasing to 30 seconds
- Long-interval
- 4 to 5 bouts
- 60 seconds increasing to 90 seconds
- Bouts separated by recovery periods allowing heart rate to return to 120 to 130 bpm
- Creatine phosphate recovery may take 4 minutes to replete beteem maximal bouts
Dependant Variables
- Fat Loss measured in millimeters
- Difference of before and after sum of skin fold measurements
- Sum of skin folds
- Triceps, Biceps, Calf, Subscapular, Suprailiac, Abdomen
Also 3-hydroxyacyl coenzyme A dehydrogenase (HADH) enzyme activity, a marker of the activity of beta-oxidation, was significantly greater after the HIIT program
No comments:
Post a Comment